Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 118 NH 176 - State v. LaBranche

State v. LaBranche’s Empirical Analysis

1978

Citation profile

71
cited by 71 later decisions
1
states following
May 2024
most recently cited

71 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 71 later decisions — most recently May 2024 · most notably State v. Farrow (1978), State v. Ellison (1991)

71 state decisions

270197819801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Bruton v. United States · Spencer v. State of Texas a Bell · Delli Paoli v. United States · State v. Cote · State v. Ruelke

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 71 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[a]n appellate tribunal cannot read the jury's mind or speculate on the result that would have been obtained had not this improper evidence been put on the scale against the defendant.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “counsel may refrain from interrupting testimony and raising an immediate objection to avoid accentuating the potential problem,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “whether it can be said beyond a reasonable doubt that the inadmissible evidence did not affect the verdict.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.