Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 118 NH 186 - State v. Spade

State v. Spade’s Empirical Analysis

1978

Citation profile

40
cited by 40 later decisions
4
states following
October 2011
most recently cited

40 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 40 later decisions — most recently October 2011 · most notably State v. Thresher (1982), State v. Johnson (1988)

40 state decisions

32019781980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Linsky · State v. Perkins · State v. Skillings · State v. Kelley · State v. Havey

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 40 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““We have long held that the State is not necessarily bound by a date specified in an indictment when time is not an element of the crime charged and proof that the event happened on the precise day named in the indictment is not required. E.g., State v. Skillings, 99 N.H. 427 , 113 A.2d 490 (1955); State v. Kennard, 74 N.H. 76 , 65 A. 376 (1906); State v. Kelley, 66 N.H. 577 , 29 A. 843 (1891); State v. Blaisdell, 49 N.H. 81 (1869).””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““Courts have generally held that if time is not of the essence of an offense charged, an erroneous or defective allegation as to ... time ... is a matter of form which may be corrected .... Amendment is not allowed, however, when the circumstances of the case are such that a change must be regarded as a matter of substance, as effecting a change in the offense charged, or as adding an offense.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. ““No indictment, complaint, return, process, judgment or other proceeding, in any criminal case in the courts or course of justice, shall be abated, quashed or reversed for any error or mistake where the person or case may be rightly understood by the court, nor through any defect or want of form or addition; and courts and justices may, on motion, order amendments in any such case.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.