State v. Fuller’s Empirical Analysis
1990
Citation profile
28 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently October 2011 · most notably State v. Perry (1991), State v. Morton (1998)
28 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Edwards v. Arizona · Michigan v. Mosley · Oregon v. Bradshaw · Edwards v. Arizona
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Without, therefore, intimating unanimity in the holding of Hartley , we do express our unanimous agreement on what that holding is, as stated at the outset of that opinion: "In the absence of * * * renewed [ Miranda ] warnings any inculpatory statement given in response to police-initiated custodial interrogation after the right to silence has been invoked is inadmissible." 103 N.J. at 256 , 511 A. 2d 80 (emphasis added). Because it was the defendant who in this case initiated the discussion, the Hartley holding does not control the outcome.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“In the absence of * * * renewed [ Miranda ] warnings any inculpatory statement given in response to police-initiated custodial interrogation after the right to silence has been invoked is inadmissible.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“inviting discussion of the crimes for which he was being held,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Chew
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.