Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 118 N.M. 8 - State v. Danek

State v. Danek’s Empirical Analysis

1994

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
2
states following
November 2018
most recently cited

10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently November 2018

10 state decisions

60199420002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Securities & Exchange Commission v. W. J. Howey Co. · Alexander v. Delgado Ex Rel. Delgado · State v. Wilson · Farmington National Bank v. Basin Plastics, Inc. · STATE, BY & THROUGH DEPT. OF HYS. v. Helehan

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “When reviewing a [district] court's grant of a new trial, the appellate court must follow a two-step approach. First, this court must determine whether the grant of a new trial is based upon legal error. Second, this court must determine whether the error is substantial enough to warrant the exercise of the [district] court's discretion.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.