Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 118 OHIOAPP3D 371 - In Re Good

In Re Good’s Empirical Analysis

1997

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
1
states following
April 2025
most recently cited

18 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently April 2025

18 state decisions

1401997200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Jenks · Gault · State v. Dehass · American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance v. United States · State v. Moreland

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he weight to be given the evidence and the credibility of the witnesses are primarily issues to be decided by the trier of fact.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “The trier of fact has the benefit of seeing and hearing the witnesses testify and is in the best position to determine the facts of the case.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “A complaint in juvenile court alleging delinquency does not need to be read as strictly as a criminal indictment.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.