Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

118 Ohio App. 3d 444

693 N.E.2d 301

State v. Brooks

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided February 26, 1997

Ohio Court of Appeals · decided 1997-02-26

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently May 2017

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1997-02-26

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Quillin, Judge,

¶1 concurring.

¶2 The Supreme Court had before it the corrected record when it issued its mandate to the trial court. The prosecution now asks us to change that Supreme Court mandate. Whether we agree with the Supreme Court or not, as lower courts, both we and the trial court are bound by that mandate. If the prosecution wishes to have the mandate altered, it should make that argument to the Supreme Court.

/118/ohioapp3d/444 · .json · Public domain