Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 118 Ohio App. 3d 763 - West v. Otis Elevator Co.

118 Ohio App. 3d 763 - West v. Otis Elevator Co.’s Empirical Analysis

1997

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
May 2006
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Dresher v. Burt · Harless v. Willis Day Warehousing Co. · 59 Ohio St. 3d 108 - Wing v. Anchor Media, Ltd. · Amerine v. Haughton Elevator Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Civ.R. 15(D) specifically requires that the summons must be served personally upon the defendant. In this case, service was performed by way of certified mail which is clearly not in accordance with the requirement of Civ.R. 15(D). Civ.R. 15(D) also requires that the summons must contain the words ‘name unknown.’ Appellants also failed to meet this specific requirement of the rule. (Emphasis sic.) Id. at 58 , 537 N.E.2d at 209 ,.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.