118 Ohio App. 3d 767 - State v. Cockerham’s Empirical Analysis
1997
Citation profile
15 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently May 2021
15 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 34 Ohio App. 3d 33 - State v. Williams · 30 Ohio App. 3d 118 - City of Brook Park v. Necak · 40 Ohio App. 3d 7 - State v. Addison · 7 Ohio App. 3d 266 - City of Columbus v. Messer · 8 Ohio App. 3d 412 - State v. Trivedi
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Generally, the right to order restitution is limited to the actual damage or loss caused by the offense of which the defendant is convicted.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“{¶ 9} Appellant's first and third assignments of error are interrelated and will be addressed in a consolidated manner. For the first assignment of error, appellant alleges that the trial court erred in determining the amount of restitution as there was insufficient evidence and information in the record for the court to ascertain the amount to a reasonable degree of certainty. Under the third assignment of error, appellant claims that the trial court erred when it ordered a prison term based on the amount of restitution, which was not supported by the record. {¶ 10}”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“it is not proper to allow the probation department to make the determination as to what the amount of restitution would be”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.