Perry v. Morrison’s Empirical Analysis
1926
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 12 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently July 1952
3 federal appellate · 12 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on O. K. Boiler & Welding Co. v. Minnetonka Lumber Co. · Ocdike v. Martin · Cassidy v. Gould
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Defendant should be held to an accounting and to pay plaintiff one-half of the $2,000 with interest, after adjusting" any amounts due the parties or expenditures in. the joint venture.’’”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Morrison v. Perry““A ‘joint adventure’ is a special combination of two or more persons where in some specific venture a profit is jointly sought without any actual partnership or corporate designation.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Smith v. Burt
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.