Campbell v. Vance’s Empirical Analysis
1926
Citation profile
8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
November 1939
most recently cited
8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Richardson v. Fellner · Baker v. Jack · Rogers Et Ux. v. O.K. Bus Baggage Co. · International Bank of Coalgate v. Mullen Mullen · Zarrow v. Whisler
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Where the execution of a note is denied under oath, and on the trial the genuineness of the signatures to the note is admitted, but it is claimed that a material alteration has been made in the note subsequent to its execution; the presumption will be entertained that all alterations or interlineations were made prior to and with the consent of the makers, and the burden will be on the one alleging such alterations to show that they were made subsequent to the execution of the instrument, and without the consent of the makers.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.