Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 118 Or. App. 64 - State v. Arnold

118 Or. App. 64 - State v. Arnold’s Empirical Analysis

1993

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
September 1994
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"We see no reason why, on these facts, counsel's tactical decision not to move for a continuance is determinative of whether the motion for a new trial should have been granted. Only the Citrus College degree was in question at the time of trial. Counsel had to determine whether a delayed challenge to a dated degree from a two-year college would be effective enough to justify the formidable difficulties in proving that Jenkins had lied. A continuance is no substitute for immediate cross-examination that exposes the witness as a liar." State v. Arnold, supra, 118 Or.App. at 69 , 846 P.2d 418 (footnote omitted).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “"I audited seven classes while my husband was an undergraduate student at SOC [Southern Oregon College]—all classes pertained to child development."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “a high school diploma or a GED Certificate.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.