Edmonds v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
January 2008
most recently cited
10 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Booker · Apprendi v. New Jersey · Blakely v. Washington · 154 Wash. 2d 118 - State v. Hughes · 35 Cal. 4th 1238 - People v. Black
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“For [a] defendant to be convicted of [a] crime ..., one of three things had to happen: either (1) the defendant exercised their right to trial by jury, and the jury found the defendant guilty; or (2) the defendant was offered a jury trial but waived it, choosing instead to be tried by a judge, and the judge found the defendant guilty; or (3) the defendant was offered a jury trial but waived trial altogether, choosing instead to enter a plea of guilty or no contest. Regardless of how the defendant was found guilty, the defendant’s right to jury trial and the defendant’s right to proof beyond a reasonable doubt were both honored — and thus Blakely is satisfied.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Lockuk v. State · Grohs v. State“the Alaska Constitution guarantees [no] broader right to jury trial with respect to sentencing factors than the right to jury trial recognized in Blakely.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Moore v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.