Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 118 P.3d 413 - State v. Mobley

State v. Mobley’s Empirical Analysis

2005

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
5
states following
April 2021
most recently cited

6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently April 2021

6 state decisions

30200520102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on California v. Green · Kentucky v. Stincer · United States v. Owens · 94 Wash. 2d 216 - State v. Green · 88 Wash. 2d 899 - State v. Partin

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"When synthesized with Washington's constructive possession law, the core question seems to be whether the totality of the circumstances establishes that a defendant reached out for and exercised dominion and control over the images at issue. See id. [ United States v. Perez, 247 F.Supp.2d 459 (S.D.N.Y. 2003)]; see also [ United States v.] Tucker , 305 F.3d [1193] 1204 [(10th Cir. 2002)]; [State v.] Callahan, 77 Wash.2d [27] at 29, 459 P.2d 400 [(1969)]. This approach recognizes and promotes the purposes behind Washington's child pornography statute, to protect children by discouraging their sexual exploitation for commercial gain and personal satisfaction. See RCW 9.68A.001. Therefore, evidence of `reaching out for' and `controlling' child pornographic images is incriminating, while inadvertent viewing questions are left to the fact finder."”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “reached out for and exercised dominion and control”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.