State v. Berberian’s Empirical Analysis
1977
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 30 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 35 later decisions — most recently March 2002 · most notably Louis Neron v. James E. Tierney, Etc. (1988), Government of Virgin Islands v. Nicholas (1985)
4 federal appellate · 30 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Irvin v. Dowd · Darr v. Burford · Salinger v. Loisel · Rabinowitz v. United States · Lyda v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In this case, we find that the record indicates that the juror in question had a hearing impairment sufficient to deny the petitioner’s right to a fair, impartial trial and a unanimous verdict. The juror’s own statement that he was unable to hear all of the testimony in the case cannot be considered persuasive, since he would not necessarily be aware of what he could not hear. Thus, since the juror’s deafness may have adversely affected his ability to decide the case intelligently, we must grant the petition for habeas corpus in order to insure a fair trial.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“reasonable diligence on the voir dire examination should have known of a juror's disqualification waives the right to object thereto by waiting to raise the objection until after the verdict”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“`able to comprehend and intelligently resolve the factual issues submitted to its verdict.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Cook v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.