Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 118 So. 2d 704 - Murray v. Patton

118 So. 2d 704 - Murray v. Patton’s Empirical Analysis

1960

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
February 1972
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Boutte v. New Orleans Terminal Co. · Estes v. &198tna Casualty Surety Co. · Labat v. Gaerthner Realty Co., Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ * * * knowledge of a ‘generally defective condition’ will not defeat an action ‘unless the particular defect which caused the injury is such as to indicate apparent, imminent danger.’” Guidry v. New Amsterdam Casualty Company, supra; Prudhomme v. Berry, La.App., 69 So.2d 620 ; Jennings v. Bolte, La.App., 168 So. 377 .”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “"* * * To assume that the lessee, in this case, knew that the balcony was so rotten that it could not withstand her weight would be to assume that she committed suicide. All that could be assumed in that respect would be that she knew or ought to have known that the balcony was unsafe. The evidence, however, does not justify our concluding that the danger was so apparent as to do away with the provisions of article 2695 of the Civil Code, whereby the lessor was bound to guarantee the lessee against all vices and defects in the leased premises and to indemnify her for any loss resulting therefrom." 72 So. at 516 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. ““When we come to consider the amount awarded to her for her injuries and the amount awarded to Mr. Murray we find that the record is woefully lacking in the necessary proof as to the extent of her injuries, the period of her disability and consequent loss of earnings and the total expense necessarily incurred by Mr. Murray as a result of Mrs. Murray’s injuries.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.