Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

118 So. 3d 285

Caldwell v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2013-07-26

Decided 2013-07-26

PER CURIAM.

¶1We affirm the appellant’s judgment and sentence, but do so without prejudice to the appellant’s right to file a rule 3.850 or 3.800(a) motion seeking additional credit. *286See Hope v. State, — So.3d-(Fla. 1st DCA 2013) (holding, even if claims were meritorious, appellant did not preserve sentencing claims for appellate review through contemporaneous objection or 3.800 motion).

¶2AFFIRMED.

BENTON, THOMAS, and CLARK, JJ., concur.
/118/so3d/285 · .json · Public domain