Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

118 So. 3d 285

Jackson v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2013-07-26

Relies on Anders v. California · State v. Hudson · 855 So. 2d 1180 - Baldwin v. State

Decided 2013-07-26

PER CURIAM.

¶1In this Anders1appeal, we affirm Appellants judgments and sentences, but remand for the trial court to enter an order revoking his probation and specifying the conditions of probation that he was found to have violated. See Leggs v. State, 27 So.3d 155 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010) (affirming, in an Anders appeal, the appellant’s judgment and sentence, but remanding with directions that the trial court enter an order specifying the conditions of probation violated). Appellant need not be present. See Baldwin v. State, 855 So.2d 1180 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003) (remanding for entry of a written revocation order conforming to the oral pronouncement in an Anders appeal).

¶2AFFIRMED and REMANDED.

LEWIS, C.J., BENTON, and WETHERELL, JJ., concur.

¶3. Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967).

/118/so3d/285 · .json · Public domain