¶1 Plaintiffs in error having filed no briefs upon this writ of error, the same is dis *933 missed for want of prosecution. Haynes v. J. M. Radford Grocery Co., 118 Tex. 277, 14 S.W.2d 811.
¶2 Dismissed.
118 S.W.2d 932
Holcomb v. Copeland
Decided June 16, 1938
Court of Appeals of Texas · decided 1938-06-16
Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently November 1948
1 state decisions
Relies on Haynes v. J. F. Radford Grocery Company
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1938-06-16
View the full empirical analysis of this case →