Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 118 SW3D 323 - Burroughs v. Magee

Burroughs v. Magee’s Empirical Analysis

2003

Citation profile

33
cited by 33 later decisions
5
states following
January 2025
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 22 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 33 later decisions — most recently January 2025 · most notably Cheryl Brown Giggers v. Memphis Housing Authority (2009), Doug Satterfield v. Breeding Insulation Company (2008)

2 federal appellate · 22 state decisions

180200320102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Webb v. Jarvis · Bain v. Wells · Staples v. CBL & Associates, Inc. · McCall v. Wilder · Bradshaw v. Daniel

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]he foreseeable probability of the harm or injury occurring; the possible magnitude of the potential harm or injury; the importance or social value of the activity engaged in by defendant; the usefulness of the conduct to defendant; the feasibility of alternative, safer conduct and the relative costs and burdens associated with that conduct; the relative usefulness of the safer conduct; and the relative safety of alternative conduct.”
    8 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “(1) the foreseeable probability of the harm or injury occurring; (2) the possible magnitude of the potential harm or injury; (3) the importance or social value of the activity engaged in by the defendant; (4) the usefulness of the conduct to the defendant; (5) the feasibility of alternative conduct that is safer; (6) the relative costs and burdens associated with that safer conduct; (7) the relative usefulness of the safer conduct; and (8) the relative safety of alternative conduct.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  3. “if the foreseeable probability and gravity of harm posed by defendant's conduct outweigh the burden upon defendant to engage in alternative conduct that would have prevented the harm.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.