Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 118 Tex. 143 - Brown v. Johnson

Brown v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis

1929

Citation profile

46
cited by 46 later decisions
2
states following
April 2017
most recently cited

40 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 46 later decisions — most recently April 2017 · most notably Rohrt v. Kelley Manufacturing Company (1961), Cleveland v. Milner (1943)

40 state decisions

1001929193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 46 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The possession of the land is with the owner as against the mere cropper, because a mere cropper is in the status of an employee, one hired to work the land and to be compensated by a share of the crop-raised, with the right only to ingress and egress on the property. This is not so as to-the tenant, who has a substantial right in-the land itself for c. fixed time.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “"`A casual reading of our landlord and tenant law demonstrates that one of the essentials of a valid leasing of premises whereby the relation of landlord and tenant is established, is that exclusive possession of the premises rightfully belonging to one party is transferred to another, and thus the relation of landlord and tenant is established.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “To create the relationship of landlord and tenant, no particular words are necessary, but it is indispensable that it should appear to have been the intention of one party to dispossess himself of the premises and of the other to occupy them.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.