Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 118 Tex. 196 - Vogel v. Allen

Vogel v. Allen’s Empirical Analysis

1929

Citation profile

37
cited by 37 later decisions
1
states following
December 1978
most recently cited

34 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 37 later decisions — most recently December 1978 · most notably Edmiston v. Texas & N. O. R. (1940), Henley v. United States (1968)

34 state decisions

220192919301940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 37 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It is a general rule that the court is not authorized to render a judgment notwithstanding the findings of the jury. Fant v. Sullivan (Tex.Civ.App.) 152 S.W. 515 ; Taylor v. Davis (Tex.Civ.App.) 234 S.W. 104 ; Lemm et al. v. Miller et al. (Tex.Civ.App.) 245 S.W. 90 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““Under no view of the pleadings and evidence were appellants entitled to recover against appellee; hence the court properly ignored the findings of the jury and rendered judgment for appellee.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.