Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 118 U.S. 385 - Francis v. Flinn

Francis v. Flinn’s Empirical Analysis

118 U.S. 385 · 1886

Citation profile

87
cited by 87 later decisions
11
cited 11 times by the Supreme Court
9
states following
June 2017
most recently cited

22 federal appellate · 12 district · 20 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 87 later decisions (11 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 2017 · most notably Matthews v. Rodgers (1932), Donnelly v. United States (1913)

22 federal appellate · 12 district · 20 state decisions

22018861890190019101920193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 87 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““If the publications in the newspapers are false and injurious, he can prosecute the publishers for libel. If a court of equity could interfere and use its remedy of injunction in such cases, it would draw to itself the greater part of the litigation properly belonging to courts of law.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “The whole gist of the complaint is that the defendants do not treat the plaintiff as having a right to use his vessel as a pilot-boat, and have publicly so stated, and that some of the parties mentioned have been subjected to suits for their acts in piloting. But if this be so, the plaintiff has a full remedy for his alleged wrongs in the courts of law. They furnish no ground for the interposition of a court of equity.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.