Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 118 U.S. 520 - The Great Western

The Great Western’s Empirical Analysis

118 U.S. 520 · 1886

Citation profile

96
cited by 96 later decisions
11
cited 11 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
June 1992
most recently cited

21 federal appellate · 31 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 96 later decisions (11 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 1992 · most notably Blake v. McClung (1898), Wesley Richardson v. Judson Harmon (1911)

21 federal appellate · 31 district · 1 state decisions

210188618901900191019201930194019501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on The Lottawanna · Providence Co v. Hill Manuf'G · The " Scotland" · The New Jersey Steam Navigation Company v. The Merchants' Bank of Boston · Norwich Company v. Wright

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 96 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The next question to bo considered is whether the petitioners were bound to account for the insurance money received by them for the loss of the steamer, as a part of their interest in the same. The statute (section 4283), declares that the liability of the owner shall not exceed the amount or value of his interest in the vessel and her freight; and section 4285 declares that it shall be a sufficient compliance with the law, If he shall transfer his interest in such vessel and freight, for the benefit of the claimants, 1o a trustee. Is insurance an interest in the vessel or freight insured, within the meaning ot: tho law?””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““The issue being thus raised, the respondent was entitled to have the decree against him in that cause limited to the amount which should be shown by the proofs on the trial to be the value of said steamer and freight at the termination of the voyage. He did not need to make any surrender or attempt a surrender. A surrender of the vessel, or payment of her proceeds or value into court, would have been necessary in order to bring other creditors into concourse with the libelants; but for the mere defense of that cause it was not necessary.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. The Lotta

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.