118 Wash. 2d 649 - State v. Collicott’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
66 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 66 later decisions — most recently December 2024 · most notably State v. Tili (1999), 138 Wash. 2d 466 - State v. Sweet (1999)
66 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 109 Wash. 2d 207 - State v. Dunaway · 106 Wash. 2d 514 - State v. Nordby · 109 Wash. 2d 947 - Allingham v. City of Seattle · 108 Wash. 2d 419 - State v. Fisher · 92 Wash. 2d 671 - State v. Johnson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 66 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“`Imposition of an exceptional sentence is directly related to a correct determination of the standard range. That determination can be made only after the offender score is correctly calculated.'”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Parker · State v. Worl“"To reverse a sentence which is outside the sentence range, the reviewing court must find: (a) Either that the reasons supplied by the sentencing judge are not supported by the record which was before the judge or that those reasons do not justify a sentence outside the standard range for that offense; or (b) that the sentence imposed was clearly excessive or clearly too lenient."”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“a conviction which exists before the date of sentencing for the offense for which the offender score is being computed.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Bryan · State v. Clark
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.