Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 118 Wash. 2d 773 - State v. Lessley

118 Wash. 2d 773 - State v. Lessley’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

80
cited by 80 later decisions
1
states following
September 2023
most recently cited

76 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 80 later decisions — most recently September 2023 · most notably 126 Wash. 2d 136 - State v. Brett (1995), 125 Wash. 2d 378 - State v. Maxfield (1994)

76 state decisions

3601992200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 109 Wash. 2d 207 - State v. Dunaway · 118 Wash. 2d 649 - State v. Collicott · 112 Wash. 2d 399 - State v. Collicott · 59 Wash. App. 461 - State v. Lessley · 59 Wash. App. 447 - State v. Dunbar

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 80 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Exception of the Washington Sentencing Reform Act: Making the Punishment Fit the Crimes—State v. Collicott, 112 Wash.2d 399 , 771 P.2d 1137 (1989), 65 WASH. L.REV. 397, 402-03 (1990). State v. Lessley, 118 Wash.2d 773, 778 , 827 P.2d 996 (1992). ¶ 42 We construe RCW 9.94A.589(1)(a) narrowly to disallow most assertions of”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. “`Same criminal conduct' means two or more crimes that require the same criminal intent, are committed at the same time and place, and involve the same victim.”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  3. “Except as provided in (b) or (c) of this subsection, whenever a person is to be sentenced for two or more current offenses, the sentence range for each current offense shall be determined by using all other current and prior convictions as if they were prior convictions for the purpose of the offender score .... Sentences imposed under this subsection shall be served concurrently. Consecutive sentences may only be imposed under the exceptional sentence provisions of RCW 9.94A.535.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.