Stevens v. Gordon’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Johnson v. Johnson · 120 Wash. 2d 246 - Washburn v. Beatt Equipment Co. · 55 Wash. App. 685 - Odegaard v. Everett School District No. 2 · 117 Wash. 2d 242 - Douglas v. Freeman · 103 Wash. 2d 831 - Bingaman v. Grays Harbor Community Hospital
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“if he decided to call Dr. Sears as a witness at trial. CP at 46. By invoking Mothershead , Mr. Gordon protected Dr. Sears from any attempts to obtain deposition testimony or to present Dr. Sears's report or testimony at arbitration. CR 26(b)(5)(B). Apparently Mr. Gordon was not satisfied with Dr. Rinaldi's testimony at arbitration. Approximately six weeks before the trial de novo, his counsel sent Ms. Stevens's counsel the supplemental report of Dr. Sears, declaring that”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Stevens v. Gordon“The defendants are appealing the trial court's exclusion of Dr. Sears as an expert witness, the testimony of Dr. Rinaldi regarding the cost of future medical treatment, the trial court's giving of the jury instruction for future wage loss and future medical damages, the trial court's giving of the causation jury instruction, the trial court's refusal to give the defendants' proposed causation jury instruction, and the jury award of future economic damages.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Stevens v. Gordon“the trial court's exclusion of Dr. Sears as an expert witness, the testimony of Dr. Rinaldi regarding the cost of future medical treatment, the trial court's giving of the jury instruction for future wage loss and future medical damages, the trial court's giving of the causation instruction, the trial court's refusal to give the defendants' proposed causation jury instruction, and the jury award of future economic damages.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Stevens v. Gordon
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.