Farley v. Nagle’s Empirical Analysis
1898
Citation profile
1 district · 7 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently March 1996
1 district · 7 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Stocks v. Young · Brady v. Huff · Nelms v. Kennon · Sibley v. Alba · Pryor v. Hollinger
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Tlie statute makes it a condition precedent to redemption, tliat tlie debtor must, within ten days after the sale, have delivered possession of the property sold to the purchaser on his demand or that of his vendee. Unless the debtor remains in possession after such demand as the tenant of the purchaser, a failure to deliver possession in the time prescribed forfeits the right of redemption. Stocks v. Young, 67 Ala. 341 .””
1 later decision quote this exact passage““The possession of the land must he delivered to the purchaser, within ten days after the sale thereof, by the debtor, if in his possession, * * * on written demand of the purchaser or his vendee. * * * ””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.