Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 119 ARIZ 174 - Montes v. Lininger

Montes v. Lininger’s Empirical Analysis

1978

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
June 1978
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Peacock v. Board of Regents of Universities & State Colleges · Jacobs v. Kunes · City of Flagstaff v. SUPERIOR COURT, ETC.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““We believe that Jacobs v. Kunes, supra, holds that as long as a meaningful post-termination hearing is held and the employee has a chance to recover back salary if his termination is found to be unlawful, a person may be discharged without hearing when the interest of the employer indicates this is necessary.” (Emphasis added) 569 P.2d at 814 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.