Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 119 ARIZ 213 - State v. Decker

State v. Decker’s Empirical Analysis

1977

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
March 1980
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Coolidge v. New Hampshire · Johnson v. United States · Ker v. State of California · Sedillo v. United States · McDonald v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““In my opinion, under the facts of this case, the mere odor of burning marijuana is not by itself sufficient circumstantial evidence to constitute probable cause to justify entry into a private residence to effect a warrantless arrest. [Citations omitted]. The aroma of burnt marijuana may have a tendency to linger in a closed environment and provides no reliable clue regarding the occupants of the residence or whether a usable amount of marijuana is concealed therein.” 119 Ariz. at 216, 580 P.2d at 354.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.