State v. McDaniel’s Empirical Analysis
1978
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
2
states following
February 1996
most recently cited
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Neil v. Biggers · Gilbert v. California · 54 Cal. 2d 621 - People v. Gould · Lovely v. United States · State v. McFarlin
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In those instances in which the offense charged involves the element of abnormal sex acts such as sodomy, child molesting, lewd and lascivious, etc., there is sufficient basis to accept proof of similar acts near in time to the offense charged as evidence of the accused’s propensity to commit such perverted acts. The “emotional propensity” exception is limited to those cases involving sexual aberration, but this is not to say that the other usual exceptions to [Rule 404(b) ] cannot be used.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Grainge
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.