In Re Martin’s Empirical Analysis
1990
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 522 · 11 U.S.C. § 541 · 29 U.S.C. § 1144 (§ 514 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974)
Relies on Bibby v. United States · Daniel v. Security Pacific National Bank · MacKey v. Lanier Collection Agency & Service, Inc. · Guidry v. Sheet Metal Workers National Pension Fund · Goff v. Taylor
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“... except as provided in subsection (b) and (c)(2) of this section, all legal and equitable interests of the debtor in property as of the commencement of the case are properties of the estate.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. In Re Knowles · In Re Morrow“a restriction on the transfer of a beneficial interest of the debtor in a trust that is enforceable under applicable nonbank-ruptcy law is enforceable in a case under this title.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. In Re Knowles · In Re Morrow“(2)(a) Except as provided in paragraph (b), any money or other assets payable to a participant or beneficiary from, or any interest of any participant or beneficiary in a retirement or profit-sharing plan that is qualified under s. 401(a), s. 403(a), s. 403(b), s. 408, or s. 409 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, is exempt from all claims of creditors of the beneficiary or participant.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. In Re Knowles · In Re Morrow
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.