In Re Post v. Ewing’s Empirical Analysis
1989
Citation profile
How this case has been cited
Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently November 2012
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 349 · 11 U.S.C. § 524 · 11 U.S.C. § 525
Relies on Stardust Inn, Inc. v. Doshi (In Re Stardust Inn, Inc.) · Franklin Beneficial Trust Deeds v. J Franklin L · Auto Auction, Inc. v. Pocklington (In Re Pocklington) · Gagel v. Kingston-Greene Partners, Ltd. (In Re GWF Investment, Ltd.) · Diversified Mortgage Investors, Inc. v. Lake Tahoe Land Co. (In Re Lake Tahoe Land Co.)
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.