Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 119 BR 757 - In Re Smith

In Re Smith’s Empirical Analysis

1990

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
1
states following
May 2009
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 11 U.S.C. § 522

Relies on United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc. · United States v. Whiting Pools, Inc. · White v. Stump · 11 1024 70155 Thompson Thompson · Dominion Bank v. Nuckolls

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Although the typical Bankruptcy Clerk’s notice of the § 341 meeting to creditors includes notice of the 30 day limit of Rule 4003(b), it says nothing at all about lien avoidance. Since creditors receive neither the list of exemptions claimed nor the § 521(2) debtor’s Statement of Intentions, the only way the lien creditor can determine if the lien is even in jeopardy is to examine the court file. At a minimum, due process should require that the lien creditor receive notice (rather than be required to search for it) that the liened property is claimed as exempt before the time to object has expired.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.