In Re Alberto’s Empirical Analysis
1990
Citation profile
1 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 1107 · 11 U.S.C. § 1125 · 11 U.S.C. § 362 · 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 1334 · 28 U.S.C. § 157 · 28 U.S.C. § 158 · 28 U.S.C. § 455
Relies on Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp. · Pelaes v. United States · Lawrence v. United States · Pavelic v. Marvel Entertainment Group · Mars Steel Corp. v. Continental Bank N.A.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Every petition, pleading, motion and other paper (emphasis supplied) served or filed in a case under the Code on behalf of a party represented by an attorney, except a list, schedule, or statement, or amendments thereto, shall be signed by at least one attorney of record in the attorney’s individual name ... The signature of an attorney or a party constitute a certificate that the attorney or party has read the document; that to the best of the attorney’s or party’s knowledge, information and belief formed after reasonable inquiry, it is well grounded in fact ... If a document is not signed, it shall be stricken unless it is signed promptly after the omission is called to the attention of the person whose signature is required ...”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.