Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

119 Cal. App. 106

Percy v. Allen

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 9, 1931

California Court of Appeal · decided 1931-12-09

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently April 1947

1 state decisions

Relies on Bryant v. Kelly · 101 Cal. App. 374 - O'Neill v. Hicks · Tyler v. City Council of Huntington Park

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1931-12-09

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

MARKS, J.

¶1Appellants gave the following notice of appeal in the court below: “Notice is hereby given that the plaintiffs do hereby appeal to the Supreme Court of the State of California from the order of the above entitled court made and entered on Monday, the 29th day of December, 1930, sustaining defendant’s demurrer to the first amended complaint of the plaintiff above named, and from the whole thereof.” As the case is within the appellate jurisdiction of this court it was transferred here for decision.

¶2Under the provisions of section 963' of the Code of Civil Procedure, an appeal cannot be taken from an order sustaining a demurrer. An attempted appeal from such an order fails to give any jurisdiction to the appellate court to entertain it and must be dismissed. (Bryant v. Kelly, 203 Cal. 721 [265 Pac. 817]; Tyler v. City Council of Huntington Park et al., 97 Cal. App. 724 [276 Pac. 355]; O’Neill V. Hicks, 101 Cal. App. 374 [281 Pac. 531].)

¶3Appeal dismissed.

¶4Barnard, P. J., and Jennings, J., concurred.

/119/calapp/106 · .json · Public domain