People v. Giambone’s Empirical Analysis
1953
Citation profile
16 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently December 1981
16 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 75 Cal. App. 365 - People v. Anderson · 42 Cal. App. 2d 596 - People v. Dallas · 58 Cal. App. 637 - People v. Sharp · 90 Cal. App. 2d 762 - People v. Coronado · 60 Cal. App. 180 - People v. Navarro
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““In order to establish that the accused lived and derived support and maintenance from the earnings- of prostitution it is not necessary for the prosecution to prove that the money was expended for that purpose. (People v. Navarro, 60 Cal. App. 180 [ 212 P. 403 ].) It is not a defense that the accused had a sufficient income from other sources (People v. Coronado, 90 Cal.App.2d 762, 766-767 [ 203 P.2d 862 ]), where it is said that opulent violators of the statute are certainly more odious than impecunious ones.””
2 later decisions quote this exact passage““Any male person who, knowing a female person to be a prostitute, shall live or derive support or maintenance in whole or in part, from the earnings or proceeds of the prostitution of such prostitute ... or who shall solicit or receive compensation for soliciting for such prostitute, shall be guilty of a felony, to wit: pimping, and upon conviction for an offense under this' act shall be punished by imprisonment in the state prison for a period of not less than one year nor more than ten years.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.