Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 119 Colo. 458 - Niles v. Shinkle

Niles v. Shinkle’s Empirical Analysis

1949

Citation profile

27
cited by 27 later decisions
1
states following
June 1997
most recently cited

27 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently June 1997 · most notably Schuster v. Zwicker (1983), 34 Colo. App. 68 - Janicek v. Hinnen (1974)

27 state decisions

120194919501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Roberts v. Sims · Eldred v. Malloy · Slattery v. Robinson · Wellmuth v. Rogers · Martin v. Bower

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(b) Enlargement. When by these rules or by a notice given thereunder or by order of court an act is required or allowed to be done at or within a specified time, the court for cause shown may, at any time in its discretion (1) with or without motion or notice, order the period enlarged if request therefor is made before the expiration of the period originally prescribed or as extended by a previous order or (2) upon motion made after the expiration of the specified period permit the act to be done where the failure to act was the result of excusable neglect; but it may not extend the time for taking any action under Rules . . . 59(b). . ., except to the extent and under the conditions therein stated. (Emphasis added.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Authority for the court to permit a paper to be filed upon cause shown and on motion therefor, in the case of excusable neglect, is certainly not authority for such filing without permission of the court, without cause shown, and without motion therefor.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.