Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 119 Conn. 390 - Fierberg v. Whitcomb

Fierberg v. Whitcomb’s Empirical Analysis

1935

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
2
states following
January 1978
most recently cited

20 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently January 1978

20 state decisions

12019351940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Darrow v. Fleischner · Scovill v. Baldwin · Cullum v. Colwell · Tappan v. Knox · Hart v. Knapp

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “When a witness is equally within the control of both parties and is not called, no presumption is raised that his testimony would have been unfavorable to either party.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.