Morrell v. Wiley’s Empirical Analysis
1935
Citation profile
8 district · 21 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently January 2006 · most notably Miller v. Appleby (1981), Clark v. Haggard (1954)
8 district · 21 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Ball v. T. J. Pardy Construction Co. · Mead v. Bakewell · Morse v. Hutchins · Ford v. H. W. Dubiskie & Co. · Commonwealth Fuel Co. v. McNeil
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The rule in this State in cases of this kind is that the damages are measured by the difference between the actual value of the property received and its value had it been as represented, with any consequential damages resulting directly from the fraud.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.