In re Leslie’s Empirical Analysis
119 F. 406 · 1903
Citation profile
10 federal appellate · 9 district · 4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently February 1994 · most notably Troeder v. Lorsch (1906), Wechsler v. United States (1907)
10 federal appellate · 9 district · 4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 3 E.H. Smith 45 - Whitlatch v. . Fidelity and Casualty Co. · Heinemann v. . Heard · New York and Brooklyn Ferry Company v. . Moore · In re Logan · In re Gaylord
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““This last clause was not written into tlie law as- an encouragement to, or as a premium on, perjury. Nor was it placed there to license the bankrupt as a liar in the proceedings, and protect him from the consequences of his misstatements when he comes to apply for his discharge. The evidence cannot be used against him in any criminal proceeding. This is all.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.