Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

119 F. 474

Gray v. Schneider

United States Circuit Court for the Southern District of New York · decided 1902-11-08

<p>Motion to Compel Production and Allow Inspection of Books before Trial at Law. Rev. St. U. S. § 724 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 583].</p>

2 counsel of record

Relies on Victor G. Bloede Co. of Baltimore City v. Joseph Bancroft & Sons Co.

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1902-11-08

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently November 1962

1 district · 1 state decisions

301902191019201930194019501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶11. Inspection of Documents before Trial—Right to Relief.-

¶2Rev. St. U. S. § 724 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 583], provides that in the trial of actions at law the federal courts may, on motion and notice, require the parties to produce books or writings in their possession or power, containing evidence pertinent to the issue, in eases and under circumstances where they might be compelled to produce the same by the ordinary rules of chancery. Held, that a party litigant had the right to compel production and inspection of books before trial at law, especially where a bill of discovery had shown that books existed which contained the entries sought to be proved.

¶32. Sam:e—Nature of Order.

¶4An order for the inspection by a party litigant, before trial at law, of books which contain entries with which he has no concern, and which he ought not to see, will be conditioned to require the deposit of the books in the clerk’s office, and to provide for the attendance of a representative of the opposite party, the relevancy of contested entries to be determined in the first instance by the clerk, with summary application for review thereof to the judge at chambers.

¶5Motion to Compel Production and Allow Inspection of Books before Trial at Law. Rev. St. U. S. § 724 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 583].

¶6Carlisle Norwood, for the motion.

¶7Frayer, Smith, White & Seaman, opposed.

¶8LACOMBE, Circuit Judge.

¶9The practice in the past has been somewhat unsettled, but the exhaustive opinion in Victor G. Bloede Co. v. Joseph Bancroft & Sons Co. (C. C.) 98 Fed. 175, shows that the weight of authority is in favor of the relief prayed for, especially where a bill of discovery has elicited the information that books exist which contain the entries defendant seeks to prove. Indeed, since the act of 1892 the Code practice is also available. The books may contain other entries with which he has no concern, ánd which he ought not to see. The order, therefore, while requiring their deposit in the clerk’s office, will provide for the attendance of some representative of the plaintiff while defendant is conducting his examination. As to entries which plaintiff may contend are not relevant, and should not be disclosed, the same shall be inspected in the first instance by the clerk; and, if the parties or either of them are not satisfied with his decision thereon, application to review it may be made summarily to any judge of this court in chambers.

/119/f1d/474 · .json · Public domain