Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 119 F.1d 83 - Heckman v. Sutter

Heckman v. Sutter’s Empirical Analysis

119 F. 83 · 1902

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
1
states following
November 1994
most recently cited

6 federal appellate · 5 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently November 1994

6 federal appellate · 5 district · 1 state decisions

701902191019201930194019501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Shively v. Bowlby

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The prohibition contained in the act of . 1884 against the disturbance of the use or possession of any Indian or other person of any land in Alaska claimed by them is sufficiently general and comprehensive to include tide lands as well as lands above high-water mark. Nor is it surprising that congress, in first dealing with the then sparsely settled country, was disposed to protect its few inhabitants in the possession of lands, of whatever character, by means of which they eked out their hard and precarious existence.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““Provided, That the Indians or other persons in said district [territory] shall not be disturbed in the possession of any lands actually in their use or occupation or now claimed by them but the terms under which such persons may acquire title to such lands is reserved for future legislation by Congress.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.