Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 119 F.2d 715 - Husky Refining Co. v. Barnes

Husky Refining Co. v. Barnes’s Empirical Analysis

119 F.2d 715 · 1941

Citation profile

47
cited by 47 later decisions
7
states following
March 2013
most recently cited

28 federal appellate · 1 district · 9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 47 later decisions — most recently March 2013 · most notably McKenna v. Austin (1943), Brown v. AVEMCO Investment Corp. (1979)

28 federal appellate · 1 district · 9 state decisions

17019411950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 45 U.S.C. § 51 (Federal Employers' Liability Act)

Relies on Miller v. Union Pacific R. · Washington Co v. Hickey · 5 Cal. App. 400 - Cordiner v. Los Angeles Traction Co. · Young v. Anderson · Bunker Hill & Sullivan Mining & Concentrating Co. v. Polak

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 47 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “. . . whether the tortfeasors be joint or independent, the injured party is entitled to no more than compensation for his injury; and . . . consideration received from one, for the release of any claim against him, operates to reduce pro tanto the amount recoverable from the other.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “it is to be assumed in the absence of a showing to the contrary that the direction of the court was followed”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.