Criley’s Empirical Analysis
Citation profile
5 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently June 2017 · most notably Smith, 991 F. Supp. 174 - Wado v. Xerox Corp. (1998)
5 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Liteky et al United States · Hazen Paper Co. v. Biggins · Irwin v. Department of Veterans Affairs · In re Disbarment of Morrison · Woroski v. Nashua Corp.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[plaintiff] must allege a disparate impact on the entire protected group. i.e., workers aged 40 and over.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“in our circuit, we have recognized such a[ ] [disparate impact] action”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Smith
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.