Perez v. Marshall’s Empirical Analysis
119 F.3d 1422 · 1997
Citation profile
11 federal appellate · 9 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 38 later decisions — most recently August 2021 · most notably United States of America v. John Fife Symington III (1999), Alvarado v. Hickman (2002)
11 federal appellate · 9 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Patton v. Yount · Rushen v. Spain · Bergstrom v. Dalkon Shield Trust · In re Geschke · United States v. Wilson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 38 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“emotional instability to continue performing the essential function of a juror-deliberation.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“a trial court's findings regarding juror fitness are entitled to special deference”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[w]hether a trial court violates a defendant's Sixth Amendment right to a jury trial by excusing a juror for good cause and replacing that juror with an alternate is a question of law which we review de novo.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Elmore
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.