Manning v. Hunt’s Empirical Analysis
119 F.3d 254 · 1997
Citation profile
29 federal appellate · 10 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 92 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 2017 · most notably City of Chicago v. Morales (1999), United States of America v. Mitchell Ray Daugherty (2001)
29 federal appellate · 10 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Roe v. Wade · United States v. Salerno · Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. P Casey P Casey · Moore v. City of East Cleveland · Eisenstadt v. Baird
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 92 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In deciding whether to grant a preliminary injunction, the district court is to consider three factors. First, it must balance the likelihood of irreparable harm to the plaintiff if the injunction is refused against the likelihood of irreparable harm to the defendant if it is granted. Second, the court should consider the likelihood that the plaintiff will succeed on the merits. The more the balance of harms leans away from the plaintiff, the stronger his showing on the merits must be. Finally, the court must consider the public interest.”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“the balance ‘tips decidedly’ in favor of the plaintiff, a preliminary injunction will be granted if ‘the plaintiff has raised questions going to the merits so serious, substantial, difficult and doubtful, as to make them fair ground for litigation and thus for more deliberate investigation.’ As the balance tips away from the plaintiff, a stronger showing on the merits is required.”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[u]ntil the Supreme Court [expressly overrules Salerno ] this Court is bound to apply the Salerno standard as it has been repeatedly applied in the context of other abortion regulations reviewed by the Supreme Court”); Barnes v. Moore, 970 F.2d 12 , 14 n. 2 (5th Cir.) (”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.