Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 119 F.3d 390 - United States v. Wright

United States v. Wright’s Empirical Analysis

119 F.3d 390 · 1997

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
January 2008
most recently cited

12 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Relies on Koon v. United States · Bergstrom v. Dalkon Shield Trust · United States v. Gaytan · Ryckman v. Envirodyne Industries, Inc. · United States v. Mahaffey

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Act authorizes district courts to depart in cases that feature aggravating or mitigating circumstances of a kind or degree not adequately taken into consideration by the Commission.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[t]he text of these sections [5K2.2 and 5K2.8] explicitly covers Wright's conduct, and departing upward on the basis of any or all of the provisions was correct.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “burn[ed] [victim] with ... hot scissors, pour[ed] rubbing alcohol on his wounds and mouth, and forc[ed] him to eat dog feces.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.