Bennett v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
119 F.3d 470 · 1997
Citation profile
27 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 41 later decisions — most recently October 2018 · most notably Talbott v. Indiana (2000), Alexander v. United States (1997)
27 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2244 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Teague v. Lane · Public Citizen v. United States Department of Justice · Riggins v. Nevada · Mary Beth v. City of Chicago Tikalsky · Original Ballet Russe, Ltd. v. Ballet Theatre, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 41 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[a] claim presented in a second or successive habeas corpus application under section 2254 that was presented in a prior application shall be dismissed.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“a set of facts giving rise to a right to a legal remedy.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“more naturally read to refer to the [habeas petition] than to”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.