Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 119 F.3d 560 - Ford v. Neese

Ford v. Neese’s Empirical Analysis

119 F.3d 560 · 1997

Citation profile

27
cited by 27 later decisions
February 2012
most recently cited

22 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently February 2012 · most notably PMC, Inc. v. Sherwin-Williams Co. (1998), Albiero v. City of Kankakee (1997)

22 federal appellate ·

150199720002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1292

Relies on Foman v. Davis · Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of America · Mccall-Bey v. Franzen · Otis v. City of Chicago · Jordan v. Retirement Committee of Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “it would be helpful to all concerned if when judges retained jurisdiction of a case they said so rather than using the Aesopian 'dismissed with leave to reinstate' formula, which they do presumably so that the case will not be carried on their docket where it might mar the judge's statistical showing of prompt disposition of the cases assigned to him”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “The implication is that jurisdiction had never been lost--that it had been retained from the outset, in 1978, and never relinquished--to enable the settlement agreement to be enforced.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “without prejudice to reinstatement in the event that the . . . payments are not made by the defendant . . . .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.