Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

119 F.3d 7

Docket No. 96-55981.

Sims v. Rice

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted July 14, 1997.** Decided July 18, 1997. Submitted July 14, 1997.

This page is marked noindex.

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1997-07-18

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2253 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Swackhammer v. Widnall · Santamaria v. Horsley

Decided 1997-07-18

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.

¶1

Before HUG, KOZINSKI, and LEAVY, JJ.

¶2

MEMORANDUM*

¶3

Lennie Darrold Sims, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se the denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas petition challenging his kidnapping conviction. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253. We review de novo, see Santamaria v. Horsley, 110 F.3d 1352, 1354 (9th Cir.1997), and affirm for the reasons stated in the report and recommendation filed on June 17, 1996 and adopted by the district court on May 15, 1996.

¶4

AFFIRMED.

…

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); 9th Cir.R. 34-4. Accordingly, Sim's request for oral argument is denied

*

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3

/119/f3d/7 · .json · Public domain